If sacrificial cathodic protection works inside a tank, why not in a pipe?
1 Researcher and Technology Development Lead, FEDDO Integrated Service, Lagos, Nigeria.
2 Chief Executive Officer, FEDDO PTY LTD, Perth, Australia.
Review Article
World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 2019, 1(03), 100–118
Publication history:
Received on 23 March 2019; Revised 25 April 2019; accepted on 29 April 2019
Abstract:
Sacrificial Cathodic Protection (SCP) is a widely employed method to prevent corrosion in metallic structures, particularly those exposed to aggressive electrolytic environments. It functions by electrically connecting a more reactive metal (the anode) to the structure (the cathode), allowing the anode to corrode in place of the protected material. While SCP has demonstrated consistent efficacy in confined environments such as tanks, its application in pipeline systems has yielded inconsistent and often inadequate results. This paper investigates the scientific and engineering underpinnings of this discrepancy, offering a comparative analysis of SCP performance in tanks versus pipelines. The discussion begins by outlining the fundamental electrochemical principles behind SCP, including the need for continuous electrolyte contact, effective electrical connectivity, and uniform current distribution. Tanks, due to their enclosed geometry and stable internal electrolytes, naturally support these requirements. Conversely, pipelines present a unique set of challenges: extended physical distances, discontinuous or resistive soil environments, variable moisture content, and the presence of dielectric coatings—all of which interfere with effective current flow and ionic transport. Using both theoretical modeling and real-world case studies, this paper demonstrates how these conditions result in poor anode performance, uneven current distribution, and localized corrosion in pipelines. It also explores alternative cathodic protection strategies, such as impressed current systems, which can overcome these limitations. By demystifying common misconceptions, the study provides practical guidelines for corrosion engineers and asset managers on the appropriate use and limitations of SCP systems, emphasizing the importance of system-specific design rather than one-size-fits-all assumptions.
Keywords:
Sacrificial Cathodic Protection; Electrochemical Corrosion; Pipeline Integrity; Electrolyte Continuity; Anodic Current Distribution; Corrosion Engineering
Full text article in PDF:
Copyright information:
Copyright © 2019 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Liscense 4.0