Home
World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews
International Journal with High Impact Factor for fast publication of Research and Review articles

Main navigation

  • Home
    • Journal Information
    • Editorial Board Members
    • Reviewer Panel
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Journal Policies
    • Our CrossMark Policy
    • Publication Ethics
    • Issue in Progress
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Article processing fee
    • Track Manuscript Status
    • Get Publication Certificate
    • Join Editorial Board
    • Join Reviewer Panel
  • Contact us
  • Downloads

eISSN: 2581-9615 || CODEN: WJARAI || Impact Factor 8.2 ||  CrossRef DOI

Research and review articles are invited for publication in March 2026 (Volume 29, Issue 3) Submit manuscript

Algorithmic stewardship: Institutional investors, artificial intelligence and systemic risk

Breadcrumb

  • Home
  • Algorithmic stewardship: Institutional investors, artificial intelligence and systemic risk

Kabir Oyewale 1, * and Hosea Kipchumba 2

1 Department of Finance, Sanders College of Business, University of North Alabama, Florence, One Harrison Plaza, Florence, AL 35632, Alabama, United States.

2 Department of Accounting, Willie A. Deese College of Business and Economics, North Carolina A & T State University, Greensboro, NC 27411, North Carolina, United States.

Review Article

World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 2026, 29(01), 934-941

Article DOI: 10.30574/wjarr.2026.29.1.0110

DOI url: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2026.29.1.0110

Received on 08 December 2025; revised on 12 January 2026; accepted on 15 January 2026

Institutional investors have become the primary owners of public equities, fundamentally transforming corporate governance and market dynamics. This paper explores how the rise of artificial intelligence (AI) in investment management introduces new systemic risks and challenges traditional fiduciary duties. We define “algorithmic stewardship” as the governance of AI-driven decision-making within fiduciary institutions. Our framework connects investor constraints, AI decision rules, and market outcomes, highlighting that while AI can enhance efficiency and risk management, it may also synchronize behavior, amplify procyclical feedback loops, and obscure accountability. The paper discusses implications for regulators, suggesting the need for interaction-based oversight and AI-aware stress tests, as well as responsibilities for institutional investors. We conclude with future research directions on accounting disclosure and assurance in an AI-driven financial ecosystem.

Institutional Investors; Algorithmic Stewardship; Systemic Risk; Fiduciary Duty; Artificial Intelligence

https://wjarr.com/sites/default/files/fulltext_pdf/WJARR-2026-0110.pdf

Preview Article PDF

Kabir Oyewale and Hosea Kipchumba. Algorithmic stewardship: Institutional investors, artificial intelligence and systemic risk. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 2026, 29(1), 934-941. Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2026.29.1.0110

Copyright © Author(s). All rights reserved. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated.


All statements, opinions, and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s). The journal, editors, reviewers, and publisher disclaim any responsibility or liability for the content, including accuracy, completeness, or any consequences arising from its use.

Get Certificates

Get Publication Certificate

Download LoA

Check Corssref DOI details

Issue details

Issue Cover Page

Editorial Board

Table of content

Copyright © 2026 World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews - All rights reserved

Developed & Designed by VS Infosolution