Home
World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews
International Journal with High Impact Factor for fast publication of Research and Review articles

Main navigation

  • Home
    • Journal Information
    • Editorial Board Members
    • Reviewer Panel
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Journal Policies
    • Our CrossMark Policy
    • Publication Ethics
    • Issue in Progress
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Article processing fee
    • Track Manuscript Status
    • Get Publication Certificate
    • Join Editorial Board
    • Join Reviewer Panel
  • Contact us
  • Downloads

eISSN: 2581-9615 || CODEN: WJARAI || Impact Factor 8.2 ||  CrossRef DOI

Research and review articles are invited for publication in March 2026 (Volume 29, Issue 3) Submit manuscript

Comparative Assessment of Levodopa and Carbidopa Cleanability from Stainless Steel Surfaces: A Risk-Based Approach for Pharmaceutical Cleaning Validation

Breadcrumb

  • Home
  • Comparative Assessment of Levodopa and Carbidopa Cleanability from Stainless Steel Surfaces: A Risk-Based Approach for Pharmaceutical Cleaning Validation

Birju Patel 1, * and Jayminkumar Patel 2

1 Validation Engineering, Anika Therapeutics, Bedford, MA, USA.

2 Analytical R and D, Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Piscataway, NJ, USA.

Research Article

World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 2025, 28(01), 1960-1966

Article DOI: 10.30574/wjarr.2025.28.1.3653

DOI url: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2025.28.1.3653

Received on 19 September 2025; revised on 25 October 2025; accepted on 27 October 2025

Background: Cleaning validation represents a critical component of pharmaceutical quality assurance, requiring scientific evidence that manufacturing equipment can be consistently cleaned to predetermined acceptance criteria. The selection of worst-case products for validation studies necessitates comparative cleanability assessments based on physicochemical properties and empirical data.

Objective: To systematically evaluate and compare the cleanability profiles of Levodopa and Carbidopa from stainless steel surfaces using multiple cleaning methodologies, establishing a scientifically justified worst-case product for cleaning validation protocols.

Methods: Stainless steel coupons (316L, 50×50mm) were contaminated with 1000 μg of each compound and subjected to three cleaning procedures: purified water submersion, 0.1N sodium hydroxide solution, and 1% detergent solution, each with 2-minute contact time. Residual contamination was quantified using validated HPLC-UV methodology with swab sampling. Statistical analysis included two-sample t-tests and effect size calculations (Cohen's d).

Results: Water cleaning demonstrated significant differences in removal efficiency between Levodopa (93.00±0.14%) and Carbidopa (86.05±0.21%; p=0.0012, Cohen's d=40.83). Alkaline cleaning improved both compounds' removal (Levodopa: 99.58±0.04%, Carbidopa: 98.25±0.07%; p=0.0018), while detergent achieved optimal cleaning (>99.6% for both). Carbidopa consistently exhibited lower cleanability across all methods, with residuals exceeding acceptance limits (10 μg/coupon) under water-only cleaning (138-141 μg/coupon).

Conclusions: Carbidopa represents the worst-case product for cleaning validation due to significantly lower removal efficiency, attributed to its reduced aqueous solubility (0.2 mg/mL versus 2.0 mg/mL for Levodopa). These findings support risk-based cleaning validation approaches and emphasize the necessity of alkaline or detergent-based cleaning for adequate contamination control in multi-product facilities.

Cleaning Validation; Levodopa; Carbidopa; Worst-Case Determination; Cleanability Comparison; HPLC Analysis; Risk Assessment

https://wjarr.com/sites/default/files/fulltext_pdf/WJARR-2025-3653.pdf

Preview Article PDF

Birju Patel and Jayminkumar Patel. Comparative Assessment of Levodopa and Carbidopa Cleanability from Stainless Steel Surfaces: A Risk-Based Approach for Pharmaceutical Cleaning Validation. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 2025, 28(1), 1960-1966. Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2025.28.1.3653

Copyright © Author(s). All rights reserved. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated.


All statements, opinions, and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s). The journal, editors, reviewers, and publisher disclaim any responsibility or liability for the content, including accuracy, completeness, or any consequences arising from its use.

Get Certificates

Get Publication Certificate

Download LoA

Check Corssref DOI details

Issue details

Issue Cover Page

Editorial Board

Table of content

Copyright © 2026 World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews - All rights reserved

Developed & Designed by VS Infosolution