Master Program of Industrial Engineering and Management, Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Diponegoro (UNDIP), Jl. Prof. Soedarto SH, Tembalang Campus, Semarang 50275, Indonesia.
World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 2026, 30(03), 1969-1986
Article DOI: 10.30574/wjarr.2026.30.3.1780
Received on 19 May 2026; revised on 25 June 2026; accepted on 27 June 2026
The convergence of Physical Artificial Intelligence (Physical AI) with labour-intensive manufacturing has created expanding demand for high-quality recordings of human physical activity, with the market projected to grow from roughly US$4 billion in 2024 toward US$60 billion by the mid-2030s. Yet the prevailing approach to acquiring this data remains surveillance-oriented and productivity-centred, neglecting the socio-technical dimensions on which both worker welfare and dataset quality depend. This review re-frames manual workers not as passive subjects of monitoring but as intentional Physical AI Data Generators, whose tacit knowledge, ergonomic state and psychological experience constitute foundational data assets. Drawing on a PRISMA 2020-guided synthesis of 187 sources across industrial engineering, human-factors engineering, computer vision, occupational psychology and AI ethics, the study develops the Socio-Technical Physical AI Data Governance Framework, which integrates productivity metrics, ergonomic-risk assessment and surveillance perception within a single decision engine coupling the Fuzzy Best-Worst Method, Bayesian-network inference and Fuzzy Failure Mode and Effects Analysis. The evidence indicates that electronic performance monitoring is reliably associated with elevated worker strain; that computer-vision and wearable pipelines can automate RULA, REBA and OWAS scoring but degrade under occlusion; and that a human-centred governance configuration is expected to outperform conventional surveillance across productivity, ergonomic, trust, data-quality and ethical-compliance dimensions. The principal contribution is the articulation of Physical AI Data Governance as a distinct domain with an operationalised variable taxonomy and integrated methodology. The framework is conceptual and requires empirical validation but offers an actionable basis for human-centred data collection across manufacturing sectors and enterprise scales.
Physical AI; Data Governance; Socio-Technical Systems; Human-Centred Manufacturing; Fuzzy BWM; Industry 5.0
Preview Article PDF
Singgih Saptadi, Wiwik Budiawan and I Gede Indra Aryasa. Human workers as physical AI data generators: A socio-technical governance model for sustainable manufacturing transformation. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 2026, 30(03), 1969-1986. Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2026.30.3.1780