1 University of Energy and Natural Resources, Sunyani, Ghana.
2 Division of Kinesiology and Health, College of Health Sciences, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, USA.
3 Washington State Department of Ecology, Washington, USA.
4 Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.
5 College of Basic and Applied Sciences, Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, TN, USA.
6 Department of Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine & Health Sciences, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND, USA.
* Corresponding Author; Email: lordadjei509@gmail.com
ORCID Details
Lord Amoateng Adjei: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1679-8575
Franklin Adjei: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8158-1312
Justice Manu: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2219-0554
Kelvin McKeown Antwi Adjei: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0676-5006
Augustine Afriyie: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1304-0403
Bernard Kwame Frempong: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0676-5006
World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 2026, 31(03), 772–782
Article DOI: 10.30574/wjarr.2026.31.3.2320
Received on 31 July 2026; revised on 05 September 2026; accepted on 08 September 2026
Chronic disease surveillance is an essential part of public health because it helps governments and health organizations understand the burden of disease, identify risk factors, recognize disparities, and track changes in health outcomes. Most existing surveillance systems, however, are mainly concerned with describing what has already happened. The growing use of electronic health records, wearable devices, environmental sensors, administrative databases, and other continuously generated sources of information creates an opportunity to move surveillance toward a more forward-looking approach.
This article presents the Predictive Chronic Disease Surveillance Framework (PCDSF), a framework for using multiple data sources and machine learning to estimate changing population-level risk and to connect those estimates to public health action. The framework treats predictive surveillance as a continuous cycle: data are collected and combined, population risk is estimated, emerging patterns are identified, decisions are made, interventions are implemented, and the resulting outcomes are fed back into the system. This makes surveillance an ongoing learning process rather than a one-way reporting exercise.
The framework also makes an important distinction between predicting disease in an individual patient and predicting changes in risk across populations. Its purpose is not simply to identify who is likely to become ill, but to help public health organizations understand where risk is increasing, which groups may be most affected, and where preventive resources could have the greatest impact. Six propositions are developed around multimodal data integration, timely updating, predictive performance, intervention, equity, and continuous learning. The article also discusses privacy, interoperability, data quality, algorithmic bias, transparency, and organizational capacity as conditions that can determine whether predictive surveillance works in practice.
Chronic Disease Surveillance; Machine Learning; Predictive Analytics; Artificial Intelligence; Digital Health; Population Health; Public Health Surveillance; Risk Prediction
Preview Article PDF
Lord Amoateng Adjei, Franklin Adjei, Justice Manu, Kelvin McKeown Antwi Adjei, Augustine Afriyie and Bernard Kwame Frempong. PREDICTIVE CHRONIC DISEASE SURVEILLANCE FRAMEWORK: INTEGRATING MACHINE LEARNING, REAL-TIME DATA, AND PUBLIC HEALTH RESPONSE. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 2026, 31(03), 772–782. Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2026.31.3.2320