The Role of Investigators in the Handling of Corruption Cases

Corruption is an extraordinary crime that has far-reaching impacts on economic and political stability as well as public trust in government. The main problem addressed in this study is the role of prosecutors’ investigators in handling corruption cases and the factors that hinder the implementation of investigations, particularly in the Maluku region. This research aims to analyze the role, authority, and effectiveness of prosecutors’ investigators in handling corruption cases and to identify the various obstacles encountered in investigative practice. The research employs a descriptive qualitative method, with data collected through observation, interviews, and documentation conducted at the Maluku High Prosecutor’s Office. Data were analyzed narratively using an inductive approach, with triangulation applied to ensure data validity. The findings indicate that prosecutors’ investigators possess a strong legal basis to conduct corruption investigations in accordance with prevailing laws and regulations. The investigative process is carried out systematically, beginning with the issuance of an investigation warrant, notification of the commencement of investigation, examination of witnesses and experts, and the collection of evidence through searches, seizures, and detention when necessary. However, the effectiveness of investigations is still constrained by several factors, including the lengthy process of auditing state financial losses by relevant institutions, budget limitations, inadequate facilities and infrastructure, the geographical challenges of an archipelagic region, and uncooperative or fugitive suspects. In conclusion, the success of handling corruption cases is determined not only by the legal authority of investigators but also by the availability of resources, inter-institutional coordination, and the objective conditions of the working area.