Quantitative models in asset management: A review of efficacy and limitations

Noluthando Zamanjomane Mhlongo 1, Chinedu Ugochukwu Ike 2, Olubusola Odeyemi 3, Favour Oluwadamilare Usman 4, * and Oluwafunmi Adijat Elufioye 5

1 Department of Accounting, City Power, Johannesburg, South Africa.
2 Independent Researcher, Anambra, Nigeria.
3 Independent Researcher, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
4 Hult International Business School, USA.
5 Independent Researcher, Lagos, Nigeria.
 
Review Article
World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 2024, 21(02), 391–398
Article DOI: 10.30574/wjarr.2024.21.2.0465
 
Publication history: 
Received on 29 December 2023; revised on 03 February 2024; accepted on 06 February 2024
 
Abstract: 
This review provides a comprehensive overview of the efficacy and limitations associated with quantitative models in the field of asset management. Over the past few decades, the financial industry has witnessed a significant shift towards algorithmic and data-driven approaches in investment decision-making. Quantitative models, ranging from traditional risk-return frameworks to sophisticated machine learning algorithms, play a crucial role in shaping investment strategies and portfolio management. The review begins by examining the strengths of quantitative models, highlighting their ability to process vast amounts of financial data efficiently and objectively. These models enable investors to make data-driven decisions, manage risk, and optimize portfolio allocations. Furthermore, quantitative models facilitate the identification of patterns and trends in market behavior, allowing for timely adjustments to investment strategies. However, the efficacy of quantitative models is not without its limitations. The review explores challenges such as model risk, data quality issues, and the inherent complexity of financial markets. Model risk refers to the possibility of errors or inaccuracies in the mathematical models used, leading to suboptimal investment decisions. Additionally, the reliance on historical data assumes that future market conditions will resemble the past, a presumption that may be invalidated during unforeseen events or structural shifts. The review also delves into the ongoing debate surrounding the balance between human expertise and algorithmic decision-making. While quantitative models offer objectivity and systematic processes, the human element remains crucial for interpreting results, adapting to dynamic market conditions, and exercising judgment in situations where models may fall short. In conclusion, this review provides valuable insights into the evolving landscape of asset management through the lens of quantitative models. Recognizing their efficacy in processing vast datasets and identifying patterns, it also underscores the importance of acknowledging and addressing the limitations inherent in these models. Achieving a harmonious integration of human judgment and quantitative methodologies is crucial for enhancing the overall effectiveness of asset management strategies in a rapidly changing financial environment.
 
Keywords: 
Asset Management; Models; Finance; Efficacy; Review
 
Full text article in PDF: 
Share this