Problematic of human-wildlife conflicts in Kongo central province in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (Africa)
1 National Pedagogical University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, B.P. 8815, Kinshasa / Ngaliema, Democratic Republic of the Congo (Africa).
2 University of Lubumbashi, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, B.P. 1825, Lubumbashi, Democratic Republic of the Congo (Africa).
3 National Institute of Biomedical Research, Kinshasa /Gombe, Democratic Republic of the Congo (Africa).
⁴ University of Lubumbashi, Faculty of Economics and management, B.P. 1825, Lubumbashi, Democratic Republic of the Congo (Africa)
Research Article
World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 2022, 13(03), 393–400
Article DOI: 10.30574/wjarr.2022.13.3.0241
Publication history:
Received on 12 February 2022; revised on 19 March 2022; accepted on 21 March 2022
Abstract:
A study on the issue of Human-Wildlife Conflicts (HWC) was carried out from January 1, 2018 to June 30, 2020 in the province of Kongo Central. It consisted of: (1) Identifying the causes of Human-Wildlife Conflicts in the province, (2) Determining the social impacts generated by Human-Wildlife Conflicts and (3) Identifying the prevention and mitigation measures applied to resolve the problems of Human-Wildlife Conflicts in the province. Semi-structured surveys were carried out on the basis of an interview guide among the populations of 8 territories. The sample size was 384 households per territory chosen by the simple random sampling technique. The results showed that the competition of humans and wildlife for spaces was the leading cause of Human-Wildlife Conflicts in Kongo Central province to have been cited in 41.16% of the responses of the respondents. The loss of agricultural or pastoral production cited in 27.81% of the respondents' responses would be identified as the most significant socio-economic impact that the populations would suffer. Lethal control would be the preferred measure to prevent conflict in Kongo Central province with 30.44% of citations. Finally, community awareness and compensation by the State in the event of damage would be the measures proposed in 34.93% and 23.57% respectively of the responses of the populations.
Keywords:
Human-Wildlife Conflicts; Semi-Structured surveys; Study variables; Traditional measures; Mitigation measures.
Full text article in PDF:
Copyright information:
Copyright © 2022 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Liscense 4.0