Home
World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews
International Journal with High Impact Factor for fast publication of Research and Review articles

Main navigation

  • Home
    • Journal Information
    • Editorial Board Members
    • Reviewer Panel
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Journal Policies
    • Our CrossMark Policy
    • Publication Ethics
    • Issue in Progress
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Article processing fee
    • Track Manuscript Status
    • Get Publication Certificate
    • Join Editorial Board
    • Join Reviewer Panel
  • Contact us
  • Downloads

eISSN: 2581-9615 || CODEN: WJARAI || Impact Factor 8.2 ||  CrossRef DOI

Research and review articles are invited for publication in August 2026 (Volume 31, Issue 2) Submit manuscript

Prevalence and comparative analysis of bacterial pathogen in pus, sputum and urine samples: A prospective comparative analysis

Breadcrumb

  • Home
  • Prevalence and comparative analysis of bacterial pathogen in pus, sputum and urine samples: A prospective comparative analysis

Anuja Anil 1, *, Devipriya S 1, Gouri Krishna 1, Akhila S Arjun 2, Chitra C Nair 3 and Beena p 4

1 Pharm D student Department of Pharmacy Practice, KVM College of Pharmacy, Cherthala, Kerala, India.
2 Assistant professor, KVM College Of Pharmacy, Cherthala, Kerala, India.
3 Professor & HOD, Department of Pharmacy Practice, KVM College of Pharmacy, Cherthala, Kerala, India.
4 Principal, KVM College of Pharmacy, Cherthala, Kerala, India.

Research Article

 

World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 2026, 31(02), 437–445

Article DOI: 10.30574/wjarr.2026.31.2.2080

DOI url: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2026.31.2.2080

Received on 29 June 2026; revised on 06 August 2026; accepted on 08 August 2026

Objective: To compare and contrast the prevalence and antibiotic resistance pattern of bacterial isolates collected from different samples of pus, sputum and urine in a tertiary care hospital and to identify the prevalence of multidrug-resistant (MDR), extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL), and AmpC producing organisms.
Methods: A total of 170 patient cases selected using inclusion and exclusion criteria from Microbiology department over a period of 6 months. Case records were prospectively reviewed and data on age, gender, presenting complaints, number of hospital days, comorbid conditions, lab investigation data, diagnostic test, and therapeutic management were collected in a specially designed data collection form. Culture sensitivity reports were reviewed to analyse the Bacterial isolates. Bacterial strains of MDR, AmpC and ESBL were found using identification methods.
Results: The most isolated organisms included Escherichia coli, Klebsiella species, Pseudomonas species, and Staphylococcus aureus. Pus infections were more prevalent in males, whereas urine and sputum infections were more common in females. A higher prevalence of these three types of infections was observed in patients above 60 years of age. Staphylococcus aureus was the most frequent organism isolated from pus samples, Klebsiella species were predominant in sputum samples, and E. coli was the most common isolate in urine samples. Multidrug resistance (MDR) was detected across sputum (8.57%), pus (3.03%), and urine (6.86%) samples. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) production in sputum samples were observed in E. coli (5.71%), while AmpC production was found in Klebsiella species (2.85%). In urine samples, ESBL production was detected in E. coli (11.76%), and AmpC production was identified in both Klebsiella species and E. coli (7.84%).
Conclusion: This study suggests the need for continuous antibiotic susceptibility studies in various clinical samples to guide effective empirical therapy and to control the spread of resistance

AmpC; CLSI; ESBL; MDR

https://wjarr.com/sites/default/files/fulltext_pdf/WJARR-2026-2080.pdf

Preview Article PDF

Anuja Anil, Devipriya S, Gouri Krishna, Akhila S Arjun, Chitra C Nair and Beena p. Prevalence and comparative analysis of bacterial pathogen in pus, sputum and urine samples: A prospective comparative analysis. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 2026, 31(02), 437–445. Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2026.31.2.2080

Copyright © Author(s). All rights reserved. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated.


All statements, opinions, and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s). The journal, editors, reviewers, and publisher disclaim any responsibility or liability for the content, including accuracy, completeness, or any consequences arising from its use.

Get Certificates

Get Publication Certificate

Download LoA

Check Corssref DOI details

Issue details

Issue Cover Page

Editorial Board

Table of content

Copyright © 2026 World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews - All rights reserved

Developed & Designed by VS Infosolution