1 Department of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
2 Department of Veterinary Reproduction, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia.
* Corresponding Author
ORCID Details
Epy Muhammad Luqman: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7110-0939
Widjiati: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8376-1176
Sri Hidanah: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1734-178X
Wiwik Misaco Yuniarti: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6160-2983
Hani Plumeriastuti: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4540-811X
Eka Pramyrtha Hestianah: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8679-040X
Gracia Angelina Hendarti: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5907-9268
Rury Mega Wahyuni: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2101-1270
Viski Fitri Hendrawan: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1089-0070
Yeni dhamayanti : https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8690-8161
Wiwiek Tyasningsih: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0604-8534
Suryo Kuncorojakti: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5170-9982
World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 2026, 32(01), 1928–1933
Article DOI: 10.30574/wjarr.2026.32.1.2738
Received on 10 October 2026; revised on 25 October 2026; accepted on 27 October 2026
Community education on animal source food processing requires evaluation methods that can distinguish learning from high initial performance. This study described changes in recorded pretest and posttest scores from a community program in Abar Abir village, Bungah district, Gresik regency, Indonesia. A secondary analysis linked scores within a register for an activity dated 3 October 2026. Attendance and score completeness were summarized for all 40 registered participants; paired analyses included 29 participants with both scores. Missing entries were retained as missing, and a recorded zero was preserved. Descriptive statistics and an exploratory exact two-sided sign test were used. Mean scores increased from 95.86 ± 18.62 to 97.24 ± 14.86, a mean change of 1.38 ± 4.41 points. Three participants improved, 26 were unchanged, and none declined. Twenty-six participants (89.7%) already scored 100 at baseline. Among the three non-zero changes, the exact sign-test p value was 0.250. Five participants had pretest scores only, one had a posttest score only, and five had neither. The small observed increase was concentrated in three participants and occurred alongside a marked ceiling pattern. These records do not establish causal effectiveness, practical competence, or economic benefit. Future evaluations should document the assessment instrument, improve score completeness, assess practical food handling performance, and include follow-up measurements. These findings inform efforts to strengthen community learning assessment in support of Sustainable Development Goal 4 (Quality Education).
Community Education; Animal Source Foods; Food Safety; Pretest and Posttest; Ceiling Effect; Quality Education (SDG 4).
Preview Article PDF
Epy Muhammad Luqman, Widjiati, Sri Hidanah, Wiwik Misaco Yuniarti, Hani Plumeriastuti, Eka Pramyrtha Hestianah, Gracia Angelina Hendarti, Rury Mega Wahyuni, Viski Fitri Hendrawan, Yeni Dhamayanti, Wiwiek Tyasningsih and Suryo Kuncorojakti. KNOWLEDGE SCORE CHANGES IN A COMMUNITY PROGRAM ON ANIMAL SOURCE FOOD PROCESSING IN ABAR ABIR INDONESIA. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 2026, 32(01), 1928–1933. Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2026.32.1.2738