Home
World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews
International Journal with High Impact Factor for fast publication of Research and Review articles

Main navigation

  • Home
    • Journal Information
    • Editorial Board Members
    • Reviewer Panel
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Journal Policies
    • Our CrossMark Policy
    • Publication Ethics
    • Issue in Progress
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Article processing fee
    • Track Manuscript Status
    • Get Publication Certificate
    • Join Editorial Board
    • Join Reviewer Panel
  • Contact us
  • Downloads

eISSN: 2581-9615 || CODEN: WJARAI || Impact Factor 8.2 ||  CrossRef DOI

Research and review articles are invited for publication in March 2026 (Volume 29, Issue 3) Submit manuscript

The fading affect bias (FAB) is strongest for Jews and Buddhists and weakest for participants without religious affiliations: An exploratory analysis

Breadcrumb

  • Home
  • The fading affect bias (FAB) is strongest for Jews and Buddhists and weakest for participants without religious affiliations: An exploratory analysis

Jeffrey A. Gibbons *, Sherman A. Lee, Luke P. Fernandez, Emma D. Friedmann, Kaylee D. Harris, Hannah E. Brown, and Rachel D. Prohaska

Christopher Newport University Psychology Department Avenue of the Arts Newport News, VA  23606 United States of America.
 
Research Article
World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 2021, 09(03), 350-362
Article DOI: 10.30574/wjarr.2021.9.3.0109
DOI url: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2021.9.3.0109
 
Received on 14 February 2021; revised on 18 March 2021; accepted on 20 March 2021
 
The fading affect bias (FAB) is a robust phenomenon where unpleasant affect fades faster than pleasant affect.  The FAB is believed to be coping mechanism designed to make life appear pleasant in the face of hardships and adversities.  The FAB persists across several cultures and many event types (e.g., alcohol, religious, and death), even though low FAB has been demonstrated for social media events, videogame events, and events labeled as religious, but not spiritual.  Although religion is also believed to make life more satisfying by providing existential meaning and social connectedness for their followers, research to date, has not examined religious differences in the FAB.  Therefore, we examined the FAB using 2 measures of fading affect across participants’ self-reported religious affiliations and we found robust FAB effects for all categories except for an extremely small sample of Islamic followers.  The FAB effects were strongest for Jewish and Buddhist affiliations and they were weakest for participants who did not report a well-known religious affiliation.  The findings extend the literature on the FAB to religious belief systems.  Future research should replicate the current study, examine the FAB for larger samples of Muslims, Buddhists, Hindus, and Jews, and test explanations for differential FAB effects across religious affiliations.
 
Fading affect; Fading affect bias; General healthy coping; Religious affiliations
 
https://wjarr.com/sites/default/files/fulltext_pdf/WJARR-2021-0109.pdf

Preview Article PDF

Jeffrey A. Gibbons, Sherman A. Lee, Luke P. Fernandez, Emma D. Friedmann, Kaylee D. Harris, Kaylee D. Harris, Hannah E. Brown and Rachel D. Prohaska. The fading affect bias (FAB) is strongest for Jews and Buddhists and weakest for participants without religious affiliations: An exploratory analysis. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 2021, 9(3), 350-362. Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2021.9.3.0109

Copyright © Author(s). All rights reserved. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated.


All statements, opinions, and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s). The journal, editors, reviewers, and publisher disclaim any responsibility or liability for the content, including accuracy, completeness, or any consequences arising from its use.

Get Certificates

Get Publication Certificate

Download LoA

Check Corssref DOI details

Issue details

Issue Cover Page

Editorial Board

Table of content

Copyright © 2026 World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews - All rights reserved

Developed & Designed by VS Infosolution