Home
World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews
International Journal with High Impact Factor for fast publication of Research and Review articles

Main navigation

  • Home
    • Journal Information
    • Editorial Board Members
    • Reviewer Panel
    • Abstracting and Indexing
    • Journal Policies
    • Our CrossMark Policy
    • Publication Ethics
    • Issue in Progress
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Article processing fee
    • Track Manuscript Status
    • Get Publication Certificate
    • Join Editorial Board
    • Join Reviewer Panel
  • Contact us
  • Downloads

eISSN: 2581-9615 || CODEN: WJARAI || Impact Factor 8.2 ||  CrossRef DOI

Research and review articles are invited for publication in March 2026 (Volume 29, Issue 3) Submit manuscript

Energy expenditure compared to mental focus & score in three modes of golf transport/play

Breadcrumb

  • Home
  • Energy expenditure compared to mental focus & score in three modes of golf transport/play

Neil Ernest Wolkodoff 1, *, Gerald Martin Haase 2 and Ben Nathaniel Pennymon 3

1 Colorado Center for Health & Sport Science, Denver, Colorado.
2 University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.
3 Common Ground Golf Course, Aurora, Colorado.
 
Research Article
World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 2022, 16(03), 825-837
Article DOI: 10.30574/wjarr.2022.16.3.1403
DOI url: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2022.16.3.1403
 
Received on 10 November 2022; revised on 20 December 2022; accepted on 23 December 2022
 
How does energy expenditure (EE) vary in golf based on the mode of transport and play? Does walking in some form enhance mental focus and decrease scores? Do all forms of golf play qualify as health-improvement activity? To determine potential golf participation benefits, a pre-study VO2 test was used to compare EE from the trials. The ten subjects (n=10), six males and four females, were all regular golfers at an accessible public golf course. Subjects played nine-hole rounds using a motor cart (MC), pushcart (PC), and electric trolley (ET)while wearing a portable metabolic system. Data points were recorded and averaged for O2/L/min and converted to kcal per hour, oxygen consumption in VO2 ml/kg/min, and heart rate (HR). Subjects kept score and completed a mental focus survey, which rated tee shots, second to fourth shots, and the short game from 100 yards in for each trial. The MC play had the least average expenditure of the three modes of transport and play (211 kcal/hr.), followed by the ET (236 kcal/hr.) and the PC (288 kcal/hr.), p = 0.001. The ET had the highest mental focus score (6.63/10), followed by the PC (5.67) and the MC (5.01), p = .015. The average score to par was one stroke better for the two walking modes versus the MC (10.3 vs. 11.5), p= 0.1906580. Walking while playing had better potential health effects while improving positive focus and scoring benefits compared to a motor cart. Golf in the walking modes is a moderate-intensity physical activity, while MC play is lower in health and fitness benefit.
 
Golf; Energy Expenditure; VO2 Max; Kilocalories; Mental Focus; Pushcart; Electric Trolley
 
https://wjarr.com/sites/default/files/fulltext_pdf/WJARR-2022-1403.pdf

Preview Article PDF

Neil Ernest Wolkodoff, Gerald Martin Haase and Ben Nathaniel Pennymon. Energy expenditure compared to mental focus & score in three modes of golf transport/play. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 2022, 16(3), 825-837. Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2022.16.3.1403

Copyright © Author(s). All rights reserved. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and source, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated.


All statements, opinions, and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s). The journal, editors, reviewers, and publisher disclaim any responsibility or liability for the content, including accuracy, completeness, or any consequences arising from its use.

Get Certificates

Get Publication Certificate

Download LoA

Check Corssref DOI details

Issue details

Issue Cover Page

Editorial Board

Table of content

Copyright © 2026 World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews - All rights reserved

Developed & Designed by VS Infosolution