Comparative evaluation of the caesarean section rate in term nulliparas with labour dystocia following augmentation with oxytocin alone versus with oxytocin and drotaverine

Awopola Ibiebelem Jumbo 1, *, Esther Ijeoma Nonye-Enyidah 1, Rose Sitonma Iwo-Amah 1, Nonyenim Solomon Enyidah 2, Bapakaye Ngeri 1, Peacebe Sunday Abere 1, Chinweowa Ohaka 1 and Roseline Beauty Iheagwam 1

1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Rivers State University Teaching Hospital, Port-Harcourt, Nigeria.
2 Department of Internal Medicine, Rivers State University, Port-Harcourt, Nigeria.\
 
Research Article
World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 2023, 18(03), 1041–1050
Article DOI: 10.30574/wjarr.2023.18.3.1170
 
Publication history: 
Received on 07 May 2023; revised on 16 June 2023; accepted on 19 June 2023
 
Abstract: 
Background: Labour dystocia is the commonest indication for emergency caesarean section in nulliparas, and occurs when the progress of labour is abnormally slow. Labour dystocia may be caused by abnormalities in uterine contractions, slow cervical dilatation, or mechanical disproportion between the foetal presenting part and the maternal pelvis.
Augmentation of labour with oxytocin is the traditional management for labour dystocia as it enhances uterine contractions. At times, despite good uterine contractions, dystocia persists due to cervical smooth muscle spasms or mechanical factors, thereby increasing the caesarean section rate. Drotaverine is a musculotropic antispasmodic and can relieve smooth muscle spasms.
Aim/objective: This study compared the caesarean section rate in term nulliparas with labour dystocia that were augmented with oxytocin and placebo versus with oxytocin and drotaverine
Methods: This study was a single-blinded randomized clinical trial conducted between January and August 2021. It involved 156 term nulliparous women with labour dystocia that were randomized into two groups for augmentation of labour. Each group had 78 parturients that were managed with either oxytocin with a placebo or oxytocin with drotaverine. They were monitored till delivery and the caesarean section rate in both groups was compared. Data obtained were analysed with SPSS version 23 software. The level of significance was set at 0.05, P< 0.05 was statistically significant.
Results: The two groups were similar in their sociodemographic characteristics. In this study 21(13.5%) women had emergency caesarean section while 135(86.5%) had vaginal delivery following augmentation. The caesarean section rate in the oxytocin-placebo was similar to the oxytocin-drotaverine group (10 (12.8%) vs 11 (14.1%), p=0.82). The majority, 14 (67%) of the caesarean sections were due to mechanical factors, 4 (19%) were due to functional dystocia and 3(14%) were due to foetal distress.
Conclusion: The use of drotaverine with oxytocin in managing labour dystocia did not improve the caesarean section rate as the majority of the cases had mechanical dystocia.
 
Keywords: 
Labour dystocia; Caesarean section; Drotaverine; Oxytocin
 
Full text article in PDF: 
Share this